by The Democrat-and finally the B's will have to explain themselves on Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:43 pm
Well dargent, your vocal minority, just made it back into a much bigger pond with much bigger fish.....you were saying? And by the way, the manner in which you ducked my entire post was nothing short of a missed vocation in politics. Please read and edify yourself on the FACTS !!!"much bigger pond with much bigger fish" -
relatively unchanged then.
We all have different impressions of what constitutes a
big fish.
I will grant you that Paymate is a big
ger fish than any of the previous posters on this forum.
How much bigger is a subjective issue and hardly worth exploring because it is irrelevant.
Paymate's only interest in making their further submission to the ACCC is loss of revenue, to a competitor.
I find it cute that everything eBay/Paypal do is evidence of corporate evil, yet the same actions by their closest Australian competitor are seen as emanating from deeply held principles.
Or is it simply that this example of corporate evil is in line with the agenda of the rebels?
'Apart' from the obvious addition of 'one' more voice with a passionately vested interest, I fail to see how your comments above have refuted any comment I have made, perhaps you could further explain?
As for edifying myself with the facts you present.
These are little different to Paymate's ealier submission and the ACCC has already advised their complaint does not come under their umbrella of interest.
The ACCC has (by anecdotal evidence) indicated they will keep an eye on eBay to see if there is evidence of anticompetitiveness.
You are easily pleased if that satisfies you that there is reason for optimism.
Incidentally.
I cannot justly be accused of 'ducking' questions spurned by a subject I didnt raise.
I could
more fairly accuse you of introducing extraneous issues in an attempt to entrap me.
