Open source FUD is alive and kicking

Open source FUD is alive and kicking

Postby Sam Varghese » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:48 pm

Ten, or even five years ago, it was not uncommon to see articles surface periodically, spouting gross untruths about free and open source software.


The frequency with which such articles appear has lessened to a marked degree simply because people who pen them often end up being branded as fools.

In an era when this genre of software was less known and had a much smaller pool of users, it was possible to spread misinformation on the known premise that if mud is thrown, then some is likely to stick.

But these days that doesn't happen so often. Still, when it does, the author deserves to have his "arguments" examined in the cold light of day.

The latest bit of misinformation comes from a company known as SirsiDynix which makes software for libraries. I'm talking about the hallowed buildings that house books, what we call hard copies these days.

The document, composed by one Stephen Abram, the company's chief strategist and vice-president for innovation, initially surfaced at the Wikileaks site.

As an aside, let me remind Abram here that trying to spread misinformation about free and open source software is neither innovative nor good strategy. Maybe the company should rethink those designations.

I've been watching people trying to spread FUD about FOSS for the last 12 years and not one has succeeded. They've all been shot down in flames. Some of the hardy veterans who have been countering the FUD, people like the erudite David F. Skoll of the Canadian company Roaring Penguin, are still around and still firing back.

CONTINUED


Article Link at http://www.itwire.com/content/view/29010/1090/
User avatar
Sam Varghese
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:39 am

Re: Open source FUD is alive and kicking

Postby JCraig » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:45 am

There are some particularly egregious facts about SirsiDynix's gall in producing this FUD article (let's not lay all the blame on the fellow who got stuck with the task of writing/defending it). But these are facts that you likely would not know of unless you were associated in, some way, with the library business. So, the reaction among SirsiDynix's customers has been less than, shall we say, "open" to Abram's statements. Since a number of SirsiDynix's former customers are now on open source systems, and SirsiDynix is losing established customers at an unprecedented rate, this is clearly a rearguard action (and as happened the last time they came out against open source a couple of years back, is apparently not having the desired effect).

Here's one of the facts: http://www.librarytechnology.org/ltg-di ... l?RC=14288
Caveat emptor, Mr. Abram, indeed.
I'll avoid sharing any of the other facts in case SirsiDynix's legal team isn't busy enough already and wanted to make something of it.
JCraig
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:22 am


Return to Open Sauce

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest